The best UK public consultation software combines four things: an audit-ready record of every response, GDPR-safe data handling, WCAG accessibility and UK hosting with the accreditations procurement will ask for. Eight platforms appear on most UK shortlists in 2026. This guide compares them on the criteria that decide public-sector procurement, starting with Tractivity, the UK stakeholder relationship management (SRM) platform.
A consultation is rarely judged on how it was run. It's judged on what you can evidence afterwards, under the Gunning Principles, an FOI request or a judicial review. That's why this comparison weighs defensibility as heavily as features. A University of Hawaii study found 94% of spreadsheets contain errors, and PwC research found 57% of projects fail through communication breakdown, so 'we'll manage it manually' is the riskiest option on any shortlist.
The eight platforms at a glance
| Platform | HQ | Best for | G-Cloud | Accessibility | Pricing model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tractivity | UK | Full consultation and stakeholder lifecycle, regulated UK organisations | Yes (G-Cloud 14) | WCAG 2.2 Level A, Level AA in 2026 | All-inclusive, £9,495 base, published |
| Citizen Space (Delib) | UK | Formal consultation publishing | Strong UK gov references | Published standards | Per-instance |
| Commonplace | UK | Map-based community feedback on place and planning | No | Not published | Per-project |
| Govocal (formerly CitizenLab) | Belgium | Citizen idea crowdsourcing, participatory budgeting | No | Not published | Tiered |
| Granicus EngagementHQ | USA | Broad civic engagement suites | No | Not published | Enterprise, unpublished |
| Syrenis SMART | UK | Central government compliance workloads | Yes (G-Cloud 14) | WCAG 2.1 AA | Tiered with paid add-ons and record caps |
| Simply Stakeholders | Australia | Contact-led engagement outside UK regulatory scope | No | Does not meet WCAG | Tiered, unpublished |
| Jambo | Canada | Small teams leaving spreadsheets, North America | No | Not published | Modular with onboarding fee |
1. Tractivity
Tractivity manages the whole consultation lifecycle: the stakeholders you engage, the surveys and events you run, the responses and issues that come back, and the reporting that evidences all of it. It's been supporting the UK's most regulated organisations for over 25 years, including HM Treasury, Welsh Government, the Department for Transport and Norfolk County Council.
The consultation record is the core of it. Every email, meeting, survey response and comment is logged against the stakeholder it relates to, date-stamped and exportable, with 150+ pre-built reports for boards, regulators and FOI responses. On EDF’s Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C consultation programmes, around 30,000 issues were logged and tagged with a 100% response rate. Anglian Water manages 13,000+ stakeholders on the Cambridge Wastewater Treatment Plant Relocation, a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project examined by the Planning Inspectorate. Transport for the South East reports spending less than a quarter of the time on stakeholder management compared with spreadsheets, in line with the 20% efficiency gain Tractivity clients average, worth £5,000 to £8,200 per professional per year.
The platform flexes around how your team runs a consultation rather than imposing a method: your fields, your taxonomy, your reporting style. Procurement essentials are all present: ISO 27001:2022, Cyber Essentials Plus, NHS DSPT, G-Cloud 14, Welsh language support, UK data residency on Microsoft Azure UK South, and WCAG 2.2 Level A with Level AA due in 2026. Pricing is published and all-inclusive at £9,495 base plus £500 per additional user per year, with no record caps, paid modules or onboarding fees, and implementation takes four to six weeks.
If you only need to publish a one-off consultation page with no stakeholder record behind it, you may want to consider a different platform.
2. Citizen Space (Delib)
Citizen Space, from Bristol-based Delib, is a consultation portal with a strong record in UK central government, regulators and councils. It focuses tightly on publishing consultations, capturing responses and reporting on them, and does that job well.
Its boundary is where the consultation ends. Citizen Space holds the responses to a given exercise, not the ongoing relationship with the residents, councillors and community groups who reappear across projects and years. Teams often pair it with, or graduate to, a full SRM platform once they need engagement history across consultations.
Best for organisations whose primary need is formal consultation publishing.
3. Commonplace
London-based Commonplace specialises in map-based community engagement for planning, housing and place-shaping projects. Residents drop comments on an interactive map, which suits highly local, visual feedback on physical schemes.
It's designed for inbound community feedback rather than the full engagement record. Regulator engagement, political stakeholders, events, mailshots and audit-grade reporting sit outside its focus.
Best for councils and housing associations running visual, place-based consultations.
4. Govocal (formerly CitizenLab)
Brussels-based Govocal is a citizen participation platform built around idea crowdsourcing, voting and participatory budgeting, with strong multilingual support and traction in European municipalities.
It's citizen-first rather than stakeholder-first. If you need to track sentiment, issues and commitments across named stakeholders and organisations, its SRM depth is limited, and EU headquarters means UK public-sector accreditation questions need checking case by case.
Best for councils prioritising open citizen participation and idea collection.
5. Granicus EngagementHQ
EngagementHQ, part of US-based Granicus, is a broad civic engagement suite used by some UK councils and widely in North American local government. The portfolio is wide: surveys, forums, mapping and newsletters.
The breadth comes with enterprise pricing that isn't published and a US-centric product and support organisation. For UK-specific requirements, Welsh language provision, G-Cloud procurement and UK data residency all need checking carefully.
Best for large councils wanting a broad civic engagement toolkit and comfortable with a US supplier.
6. Syrenis SMART
SMART, from UK-based Syrenis, is a secure stakeholder communication platform with a genuine central government track record, particularly in the Home Office, and staff cleared to SC level. It's on G-Cloud 14 and holds Cyber Essentials Plus.
The pricing model is the main caution. Surveys are a paid add-on, support is metered in pre-paid blocks, training is billable per session, and each tier carries a hard record cap. Syrenis's product investment has also shifted towards its consent management platform, so ask about the long-term roadmap for SMART specifically.
Best for central government compliance teams with SC-cleared workloads and narrow user bases.
7. Simply Stakeholders
Sydney-based Simply Stakeholders offers a modern, clean interface and entry-level pricing, which rises quickly as records and tiers grow. It has a small UK footprint, with four named UK clients.
For UK public consultation, it doesn't currently meet WCAG accessibility standards, has no G-Cloud listing, and support runs on Australian hours, which UK teams feel during live consultations.
Best for Australian or New Zealand teams with contact-led engagement and no UK regulatory exposure.
8. Jambo
Canadian Jambo is an entry-level stakeholder information management tool. It's affordable at the entry tier and simple for small teams logging contacts and interactions, with reasonable Outlook and Gmail integrations.
Consultation surveys, stakeholder mapping and structured engagement planning aren't in the core offering; communication campaigns are a paid add-on, and there's no G-Cloud listing or UK accreditation footprint. Only one UK client is publicly identifiable.
Best for small North American teams replacing spreadsheets.
What is the best software for managing community consultations in the UK?
For UK community consultations, the strongest option is a platform that holds the whole record, who you engaged, when, how and what they said, and can evidence it under scrutiny.
That points to a full SRM platform such as Tractivity for organisations with ongoing engagement duties, with tools like Citizen Space or Commonplace fitting narrower, single-exercise needs. The deciding questions are accessibility compliance, G-Cloud availability, UK data residency and whether the record survives beyond the individual consultation.
If your next consultation needs a record that will stand up to scrutiny, book a demo and see how Tractivity handles it, with your projects, your stakeholders and your reporting in mind.
Frequently asked questions
